Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Kicked In The Ass

Published: Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Updated: Thursday, April 22, 2010 14:04


 
"Kick-Ass" is a film that does not live up to its name. The film follows the rise of Dave Lizewski in his effort to become a superhero. The journey is maligned by terrible circumstances such as poor dialogue and pointless character development. The trouble with the film is direction. For a film about a boy's odyssey, it sure lacks a sense of it.
 
A teenage male, raging with hormones is the main character for the film. It is strange that the film goes out of its way to make Lizewski horribly uninteresting on top of his already embarrassing character traits. Lizewski narrates the tale. He explains to the audience that he isn't smart, a hardcore gamer or possessive of any talent.
 
For a film that attempts to advertise toward young teens, there is a great deal of gratuity. The film is Rated R. The film relies on violence and gore to express its MPAA rating. There isn't a seemingly mature subject matter handled by the film. There are no major thematic elements or even a social commentary on the value of superheroes to the modern world. 

"Kick-Ass" positions itself as a film geared toward teens. But the level of violence and the MPAA film rating will block that entire demographic from viewing "Kick-Ass." The film caters to no particular audience because it lacks themes and is peppered by pointless violence.

Aaron Johnson does the best he can as Dave Lizewski. The name Lizewski is pronounced Looser-ski. The character's name choice should be evidence to the quality of thought by the creators. Johnson's performance hovers between levels of apathy and tears. 

Lizewski spends most of his time at a comic book store with his equally uninteresting friends. At one point he unwillingly puts the real heroes into real danger. He isn't clever or courageous. He is simply present and available. By the end of "Kick-Ass" he is nowhere closer to possessing heroic qualities than at the beginning of the film.

Nicholas Cage appears as Damon Macready. The scenes with Cage are nothing short of awkward. He plays a character who is meant to be taken seriously, but his dialogue is filled with cringe-worthy humor. He makes terrible jokes and is terrible at trying to be sweet. 

Cage comes off as a creepy uncle. Yes, it is that bad. Nothing about the character's dialogue is worth listening to; he isn't charming, wise or witty. Yet, Cage's Macready is so integral to the story that it feels like the film is doing a disservice to the audience by not making his character more likable.

The villains of "Kick-Ass" are underdeveloped as well. The audience is never told what type of drugs the criminal organization in the film sells. In one scene a passing comment is made about lost "kilos" of some product. Is it cocaine? Crack? No one knows because the film never really shows kilos being pushed around, which makes the audience think that the crimes are all imaginary. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 13:49
How do you not realize the hypocrisy of your statement? You are not adding anything of substance, m'dear. Why do you think you can tell me what not to do? I can post whatever I want, it's irrelevant if you think it's useful, you don't even know the situation. And no, posting appropriately to an internet thread is not a "valuable life skill," and calling someone a dumbass is not "useful."
Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 20:09
"Such fragile egos! He didn't like the film, get over it! It will benefit you to learn how to disagree in a respectful manner; it is a valuable life skill. "

As should be contributing something useful to a thread or not bothering to post at all..

Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 16:57
Such fragile egos! He didn't like the film, get over it! It will benefit you to learn how to disagree in a respectful manner; it is a valuable life skill.
Emotional Matches
Wed Apr 21 2010 00:46
This is a terrible example of a review, not once the reviewer mentioned the source material or how accurate Kick Ass is to the actual BOOK IT CAME FROM! People watching this movie either had the decency of reading the comic book or at least were smart enough to KNOW there was a comic book. Everything mentioned above should be ignored, the reviewer shows lack of knowledge and disrespect for the source, "guilty of being reckless with human life"? Really? first of, its wreckless second this was not rainbow bright, the movie this is Kick ass, in the comic book, Hit Girl does exactly what she did in the movie AND also gets to use her Hello Kitty Flamethrower to BBQ a crapload of other baddies, unfortunately that didnt make it to the final cut, neither did Kick Ass being tortured by having his nuts electroshocked, so to be honest the director held back some, maybe in fear of the Rainbow Bright brigade over here coming over and harping about murdering some drug dealers.. Your review is pointless, I doubt you ever read the comic book or even finished the movie, anyone could write what you did by reading the movie synopsis on Wikipedia, For all the others reading this review, ignore it and go watch it. It's Kick Ass as Kick Ass is supposed to be made, otherwise it would be called "gently pushing your bottom"
Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 00:15
That's because it's a anti-hero movie you dumbass!






log out